• 
  PODCAST: An exploration of the controversy surrounding the war plans group chat, along with Trump’s dislike of his latest portrait – all on Welcome to MAGAland. Tune in now.
  

People in Britain might have to endure a series of tax increases.
Rachel Reeves
once more this Fall, as her proposals were deemed unfeasible by a prominent research institute earlier today.

The IFS pointed out prolonging the freeze on tax brackets for an additional two years as a possible ‘simple political victory’ for the Chancellor, indicating it might generate an extra £10 billion.

Imposing taxes on withdrawals from pension funds could appear as an attractive method for generating revenue, according to director Paul Johnson.

Many progressive thinkers advocate for a ‘wealth tax,’ along with changes to capital gains rules; however, these measures likely wouldn’t significantly benefit the Treasury.

The bleak scenario came into view as the IFS conducted its usual analysis following the Spring Statement, on the subsequent day.

The economists highlighted that the plans were extremely ambitious, cautioning it was like a ‘flip of a coin’ whether Ms. Reeves could adhere to them.

Donald Trump has underscored the risks by declaring that starting April 2nd, all imported cars into the U.S. will be subject to a 25 percent tariff.

Budgets may likely require additional funding from taxes since it could be challenging to revise the departmental agreements post the completion of the Spending Review in June, suggests the think tank.

In a harsh assessment of the tactics Labor employed to bolster their financial situation, Mr. Johnson stated: “According to the OBR, there’s merely a 54 percent probability that, with our present policies, we’ll achieve a balanced current budget by the fiscal year 2029-30.”

‘Furthermore, this makes the likelihood of achieving the second fiscal objective—that public sector net financial liabilities should be decreasing that year—significantly slimmer, dropping to just 51 percent—a flip of a coin.’

Despite this, the redefinition of debt created significantly more room compared to the previous definition that was utilized up until last year.

The issue stems from the strict numeric financial rules combined with minimal flexibility around those limits, which is resulting in numerous difficulties. This leaves fiscal policies vulnerable to economic changes beyond the government’s influence.

‘That does not facilitate a reasonable policy-making process. This isn’t the OBR’s responsibility. It is a result of the Chancellor’s decisions.’

The IFS mentioned that Ms Reeves once more plans to increase fuel duty in coming years, despite this not having occurred in practice.

When asked about potential measures the Chancellor might consider if compelled to generate additional income, Mr. Johnson suggested that reforming council tax could yield some extra funds.

The head of the IFS stated that prolonging the suspension of tax brackets, which has been effective since 2022 and is scheduled to conclude in 2028-29, for an additional two years would be the “most straightforward political victory.”

Mr Johnson stated that this could attract around ‘something similar to £10 billion by the end of the period, which would be quite beneficial’.

He mentioned that capital gains reform might produce ‘a little bit of money,’ yet he was less supportive of the poorly conceived notion of implementing a ‘wealth tax.’

‘Certainly, she won’t secure a specific sum of money anytime soon with this approach,’ he stated.

During a series of broadcast interviews this morning, Ms. Reeves downplayed the likelihood of additional tax increases in autumn, though she didn’t completely dismiss the possibility.

When asked by Times Radio whether she would need to implement further cuts or tax increases in the autumn, the Chancellor responded: “No, it’s not.”

When asked if she was dismissing potential measures, Ms Reeves responded: “My point is that this government has implemented numerous policies that are fostering economic expansion.”

She stated, “This indicates that if we proceed and accelerate with our efforts to boost economic growth through planning reforms, pension reforms, and regulatory changes, we can expand the economy and generate additional funds for public services. This is where my attention lies.”

When asked whether she would step down if she violated her own fiscal guidelines to prevent tax increases or additional cutbacks, Ms. Reeves responded to the network: “I have no intention of breaking my fiscal rules. I’ve stated they are non-negotiable, and we will keep adhering to them.”

Read more