The
A journalist was added to a group chat.
Involving multiple key Cabinet members from Donald Trump’s administration who were allegedly part of discussions about war strategies have rebutted Pete Hegseth’s strong dismissal of these reports.
Jeffrey Goldberg, who serves as the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, stunned everyone with his disclosure on Monday when he unexpectedly found himself
incorporated into a discussion on Signal, an encrypted messaging platform
.
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz initiated the conversation, which involved users identified as Vice President Vance and Secretary of State.
Marco Rubio
, Defense Secretary
Pete Hegseth
Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard
, a CIA spokesperson, Trump adviser Stephen Miller and
White House
Head of Staff Susie Wiles.
Goldberg talked to CNN on Monday evening, disclosing that the conversation involved ‘assault strategies,’ specific sites, and details about those targeted along with the order of attacks against the Houthis, outlining the sequence of assaults.
Hegseth refutes the narrative
was ‘a lie.’
“No, that’s not true. He was sending texts about battle strategies and assault tactics instead. The messages included details on which targets would be hit, methods of attack, individuals present at those locations, and timings for subsequent strikes,” he stated.
The defense secretary made his debut appearance following the publication of the story, shortly after returning from a flight.
Hawaii
, criticized Goldberg much like former President Donald Trump did.
slammed his magazine
.
‘So you are talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes, time and time again.’
He mentioned several articles that The Atlantic has published.
Trump
‘s alleged connections to
Russia
,
His remarks about ‘really nice individuals’
after the
Charlottesville
riots being misinterpreted and misrepresented
The supposed remarks about ‘losers and suckers.’
Regarding soldiers who lost their lives in warfare.
“This is someone who deals with trash. That’s his business,” Hegseth added.
He commended U.S. forces engaged in combat against the Houthis in Yemen and denounced the Biden administration’s actions regarding the situation.
A journalist inquired of Hegseth, “Why were those specifics disclosed via Signal?”
Hegseth responded, “I’m aware of how it has been described. No one was sending texts with war strategies, and that’s everything I want to comment on this matter.”
When contacted for comments, a spokesperson from the Pentagon informed LIFEHACK: “We have nothing additional to share beyond what the Secretary has mentioned.”
Goldberg also mentioned that there were additional details he chose not to release because they were highly significant, overly technical, and he feared that making this information public might pose risks to the safety of U.S. military personnel.
He painted the picture of himself sitting in a supermarket parking lot as he observed the conversation unfolding.
They executed a military strategy through a messaging application without knowing all participants involved, which clearly demonstrates a laughable lapse in security. Notice how he failed to address the query directly?
He stated: “Their purpose is to maintain all these discussions at a higher level, the classified level, which is why they possess such systems.”
The editor mentions that he has no clue about who might have invited him to join the chat and is also unaware of the person they intended to invite.
‘What were the odds of inviting the editor of The Atlantic to join your conversation? How did that happen?’
Goldberg also expressed feelings of ‘genuine anxiety and anger’ regarding the ‘carelessness’ exhibited by those involved.
Keep in mind that American servicemen were directly implicated in this assault. This was not merely about long-range weaponry launched from thousands of miles away. You understand, you can’t simply release such details and expect everything to turn out fine.
Goldberg quipped that those involved should consider themselves “fortunate they didn’t mistakenly send this to a Houthi or a foreign diplomat, or someone with access to their phone records; perhaps that counts as a silver lining.”
He mentioned that throughout this time, nobody from the team ever doubted his position within the group chat or reached out after he decided to leave.
“It’s a degree of lack of curiosity, perhaps putting it mildly; what I’m really referring to is a reckless attitude that I haven’t encountered in my extensive career covering national security,” he stated.
When contacted for commentary, a spokesperson from the Pentagon informed LIFEHACK: “We have nothing further to add besides what was mentioned by the Secretary.”
Goldberg was equally astonished to witness
JD Vance disagrees with the president.
, distancing himself from Trump and also casting doubt on his understanding of the topic.
“I doubt the president realizes how contradictory this is with his current stance on Europe. Additionally, there’s a significant danger of witnessing a moderate to severe increase in oil prices,” Vance noted.
‘There is a genuine danger that people might not grasp this concept or see its necessity. The most compelling argument for taking this action is, as the President stated, to convey a clear message,’ Mr. Vance proceeded with his explanation.
Goldberg said that essentially, the person has informed the whole cabinet that he opposes the president’s choice and furthermore believes that the president lacks understanding of the matter.
CNN
.
‘It sounds quite serious; he believes the president hasn’t grasped the outcomes and implications. This revelation was both enlightening and intriguing,’ he commented.
Vance added: ‘I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc.’
Goldberg established the context for the startling exposé by verifying that he hadn’t received any previous invitation to insider information about the American security apparatus.
“As might be obvious, but I will state it nonetheless, I have never received an invitation to attend a White House principals committee meeting. Furthermore, during my extensive career covering issues related to national security, I have never come across such a meeting being called due to concerns about a commercial messaging application,” he wrote.
The Atlantic.
The startling narrative unveils how operational specifics were inadvertently disclosed. Defense Secretary Hegseth, who previously served as
Fox News
The host is currently under scrutiny due to significant failures.
Goldberg mentioned that ‘Pete Hegseth, who serves as the Secretary of Defense, sent me the battle strategy via text at 11:44 a.m.’ The airstrikes began in Yemen shortly after 2 p.m.
Trump told reporters at the White House he hadn’t seen The Atlantic story: ‘I don’t know anything about it. I’m not a big fan of the Atlantic. It’s to me, it’s a magazine that’s going out of business.’
When questioned regarding the Signal chat, Trump stated: “It must not have been too effective since the assault proved quite successful. Let me assure you that I am not familiar with this matter. This is the first I’ve heard of it.”
Goldberg recounted the strange story, initially expressing doubt regarding the text message exchange, wondering if it was authentic. He later confirmed its validity as “the bombs began dropping.”
He acknowledges that he was astonished by the notion that the National Security Adviser to the President would be so careless as to involve the Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic in conversations with high-ranking US officials, all the way up to the Vice President.
The reporter showed up as ‘JG’ in the chat. It remains uncertain whom Waltz intended to include, but Jamieson Greer, the U.S. Trade Representative, shares the same initials, leading to speculations that he might have been the intended person.
Goldberg chose not to share all details during the conversation, invoking reasons of national security.
The White House showed faith in Waltz.
As President Trump stated, the strikes against the Houthis have proven to be highly successful and effective. President Trump remains committed.
possess complete faith in his national security staff, which includes National Security Advisor Mike Waltz
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated in an official release.
The National Security Council verified that the conversation was genuine.
At her daily press briefing, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce informed journalists: “We won’t provide any comments on this matter; instead, please reach out to the White House for further information.”
If accurate, this represents a shocking security lapse.
Trump
authorized attacks on the Iran-supported rebels in Yemen as a message to Tehran.
The Houthi insurgents were aiming at vessels navigating the Red Sea that hailed from nations connected to Israel, such as the United States and Britain.
Waltz initiated the principles group on Signal for coordination purposes, calling it the ‘Houthi PC small group.’
Goldberg expressed reservations upon being included, confessing that he feared the text message exchange might be part of a ‘disinformation campaign.’
However, as he observed the messages passing by, he realized that the content seemed authentic, and several specifics aligned correctly.
For instance, the account tagged as Vance sent a message stating he would skip a meeting since he had to attend an economic event in Michigan. As expected, the vice president was present in Michigan on that particular day.
That’s when Vance also voiced his concerns regarding the operation.
Vance’s report raised alarms regarding the scheduling of the suggested mission, cautioning that it could lead to a surge in oil prices.
Hegseth replied that he grasped the situation: “VP: I comprehend your worries — and completely endorse you bringing them up with POTUS. There are several critical factors to consider, many of which are difficult to predict their outcomes (such as economic impacts, resolving the conflict in Ukraine, situations in Gaza, among others). Regardless of the approach, I believe the communication strategy will face significant challenges.”
Following some conversation, Vance agrees: “If you believe we should proceed, then let’s do it. I simply dislike having to rescue Europe once more.”
Goldberg, observing the conversation unfold on his Signal app, confessed he was ‘puzzled that nobody in the group appeared to be aware of me being there.’
He mentions that he chose to withhold certain details from a long passage penned by Hegseth, as these pieces of information—if accessed by enemies of the United States—might potentially be exploited to endanger American military and intelligence officers.
What I want to highlight to demonstrate the alarming carelessness of this Signal conversation is that the Hegseth posting included specific operational plans for upcoming attacks in Yemen,” Goldberg explained. “This entailed details such as target locations, types of weaponry the U.S. intended to use, and the sequence of assaults.
The guidelines outlined in the chat addressed Hegseth’s concerns, though.
“I shall offer a prayer for triumph,” Vance penned down.
Goldberg observes that two additional users later included prayer emojis.
If the conversation had been real, explosions would have started hitting locations in Yemen at 1:45 PM Eastern Time. In this scenario, Goldberg waited in his car at a supermarket parking lot.
If this Signal conversation was indeed genuine, I deduced that Houthi targets would swiftly come under attack. Around 1:55, I looked at X and searched for news from Yemen. It turned out explosions were echoing throughout Sanaa, the nation’s capital.
When Goldberg rejoined the group chat, he discovered an abundance of emojis and messages filled with congratulations circulating within the conversation.
Waltz replied using three emojis: a closed fist, an American flag, and flames.
Susie Wiles commented: ‘Congratulations to everyone – with extra praise for those in theater and at CENTCOM! Truly excellent. God bless.’
Steve Witkow showed his sentiment using five emojis: two praying hands, one flexed bicep, and two American flags.
Goldberg stated that he chose to leave the group chat himself and immediately reached out to those involved to inquire about the situation.
Brian Hughes, spokesperson for the National Security Council, addressed the individual and verified that the conversation was indeed genuine.
This seems to be a genuine message trail, and we are examining how an unintended figure got included,” Hughes stated. “This exchange highlights the extensive and meticulous policy collaboration among high-ranking officials. The continuous effectiveness of the Houthi initiative indicates that there weren’t any risks posed to personnel or national safety.
Read more
